Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 08/07/2025 View Wed 08/06/2025 View Tue 08/05/2025 View Mon 08/04/2025 View Sun 08/03/2025 View Sat 08/02/2025 View Fri 08/01/2025
1
2025-08-07 Government Corruption
Brennan and Clapper Don't Have A Statute Of Limitations Defense Because They're Continuing The Conspiracy
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-08-07 00:53|| || Front Page|| [193 views ]  Top

#1 
Based on a few quick data checks.

Treason DOES NOT have a Statute of Limitations.

Subversive activities, depend on the nature of the offense, and therefore may have specific limitations.


Ref Source, the US LEGAL CODE.
Posted by NN2N1 2025-08-07 06:31||   2025-08-07 06:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Treason must involve a foreign power. Sedition is natively born.
Posted by Procopius2k 2025-08-07 07:20||   2025-08-07 07:20|| Front Page Top

#3 
18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

US Code section ยง2381. Treason
It just states enemies.
So wouldn't that include Foreign and/or Domestic persons.


Also under SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES.
Wouldn't Subversive Actions include, those FED's and hired LSD's imbedded and mixed in the Jan 6er's, with instructions to incite, allow and steer protesters into certain areas to do things?
Posted by NN2N1 2025-08-07 07:47||   2025-08-07 07:47|| Front Page Top

#4 Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Posted by Procopius2k 2025-08-07 08:20||   2025-08-07 08:20|| Front Page Top

#5 only plausible crime that could stick is malicious sedition

and although there might be enough for an indictment, I don't think there is anywhere enough for a conviction

btw, a few J6 folk were convicted of malicious sedition (I didn't think there was enough to make that stick either and in fact I thought an intelligent juror would laugh when presented the evidence but then again, what do I know)

Posted by Lord Garth 2025-08-07 14:38||   2025-08-07 14:38|| Front Page Top

#6  an intelligent juror

This was a DC-based pool. Chances were minimal
Posted by Frank G 2025-08-07 14:59||   2025-08-07 14:59|| Front Page Top

#7 "The process is the punishment" works both ways
Posted by Matt 2025-08-07 15:34||   2025-08-07 15:34|| Front Page Top

#8 Argue for a change of venue demonstrating the inherent liberal bias of the DC courts, grand jury, voter registration pool.
Posted by Jack Salami 2025-08-07 18:07||   2025-08-07 18:07|| Front Page Top

22:07 badanov
21:57 SteveS
21:36 badanov
21:34 badanov
21:09 Lord Garth
21:03 Lord Garth
20:46 Secret Master
20:17 Bangkok Billy
20:06 swksvolFF
19:41 Procopius2k
19:05 Rex Mundi
18:50 SteveS
18:43 SteveS
18:40 Skidmark
18:31 Skidmark
18:07 Jack Salami
17:10 Skidmark
17:03 Grom the Affective
17:02 Skidmark
16:28 DarthVader
16:25 Skidmark
16:22 Skidmark
15:58 SteveS
15:53 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com